Robert Reif wrote:
Tom Wickline wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
- wine-directx-dmusic
- wine-directx-dsound
- wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
- wine-directx-d3d (new directx code
Tom Wickline wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
- wine-directx-dmusic
- wine-directx-dsound
- wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
- wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
Raphael wrote:
Hi,
it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
- wine-directx-dmusic
- wine-directx-dsound
- wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
- wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
As wine-directx is too much generic
and most of errors are dsound problems
Wel
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
> - wine-directx-dmusic
> - wine-directx-dsound
> - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
> - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
Could
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:07, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
> >> I'd like to completely clarify that :
> >> - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
> >> active by
> >> the person looking at it, but otherwise anything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
I'd like to completely clarify that :
- If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
active by
the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
months when the action was with the raiser can be closed
Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
1. I would like to get implemented an AUTOMATIC timeout on the bug
reports.
I have looked at this and it is not possible to do this without
drastically altering (forking) bugzilla.
I have looked into having a resolution "abandoned" and that should be
possible to do w
>> 1. I would like to get implemented an AUTOMATIC timeout on the bug
reports.
>I have looked at this and it is not possible to do this without
>drastically altering (forking) bugzilla.
>I have looked into having a resolution "abandoned" and that should be
>possible to do without forking bugzilla
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 07:57:15 -0700, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Is the current component structure inadequate?
I think it's OK, but this is just a side effect of not having any formal
module owners, but rather only informal ones.
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:30:55PM -, Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
Interestingly, even though most people seem to end up working in a
particular area they may not handle bugs in that area (probably because they
don't check for them!). How many of the wine developers would c
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:30:55PM -, Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
> Interestingly, even though most people seem to end up working in a
> particular area they may not handle bugs in that area (probably because they
> don't check for them!). How many of the wine developers would consider
> allo
Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
Hello,
I thought I'd try to start a discussion to try to encourage changes in the
bug tracking, but it would both require agreement and someone (else) who
could physically make the changes.
Is it me or is our bug tracking database not really working the way it
should?
Hello,
I thought I'd try to start a discussion to try to encourage changes in the
bug tracking, but it would both require agreement and someone (else) who
could physically make the changes.
Is it me or is our bug tracking database not really working the way it
should?
Firstly I'd like to thank T
13 matches
Mail list logo
