On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 16:32 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Please consider disabling attachments once and for all. Thanks.
OK, I'll look at that this afternoon.
--
Dimi Paun
Lattica, Inc.
Hi Dimi,
"Dimi Paun" wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 00:59 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentChanges has all the details. Please
consider at least removing the spammers' accounts listed there,
I have done that in the past, and I'll keep removing them.
A quick ping on
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
> Ok, then please can we disable attachments? And if not why? If we have to
> have attachments then is it possible to let admins only to upload them?
>
http://moinmo.in/HelpOnConfiguration/FileAttachments
---snip
The AttachFile action
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/3/16 Vitaliy Margolen :
>> Ben Klein wrote:
>>> 2009/3/14 David Gerard :
2009/3/13 John Klehm :
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without
>> hampering the good users is to give
2009/3/16 Vitaliy Margolen :
> Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2009/3/14 David Gerard :
>>> 2009/3/13 John Klehm :
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without
> hampering the good users is to give community members the pow
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/3/14 David Gerard :
>> 2009/3/13 John Klehm :
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without
hampering the good users is to give community members the power to do
the work, so it doesn'
2009/3/14 David Gerard :
> 2009/3/13 John Klehm :
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without
>>> hampering the good users is to give community members the power to do
>>> the work, so it doesn't fall to just Dimi.
>
2009/3/13 John Klehm :
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without
>> hampering the good users is to give community members the power to do
>> the work, so it doesn't fall to just Dimi.
> I'd agree, but there doesn't s
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> You need to be a SuperUser to have that power, not a mere Admin. Does
> that carry too many extra abilities with it?
>
It does carry more responsibilities. Too many isn't for me to say.
> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious us
2009/3/13 John Klehm :
> http://master.moinmo.in/HelpOnUserHandling
> Section "Disable a user account"
> The account is still there but can't post which would probably be good
> enough till dimi comes to zap it.
> Seems there is no way to delete a user account from the web gui
> without a custom p
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/3/13 Dimi Paun :
>> On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 00:59 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>>> or give a way to do that for us poor people who regularly brushes
>>> spam out of the Wine wiki.
>
>> I have no problem with that if if can be done.
>>
2009/3/13 Dimi Paun :
> On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 00:59 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>> or give a way to do that for us poor people who regularly brushes
>> spam out of the Wine wiki.
> I have no problem with that if if can be done.
> Can someone look it up what would it take to make
> Moin do that
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 00:59 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentChanges has all the details. Please
> consider at least removing the spammers' accounts listed there,
I have done that in the past, and I'll keep removing them.
A quick ping on IRC usually gets me going :)
2009/3/13 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentChanges has all the details. Please
> consider at least removing the spammers' accounts listed there,
> or give a way to do that for us poor people who regularly brushes
> spam out of the Wine wiki.
Yes, the usual remedy in this situati
"Dimi Paun" wrote:
And I'll like to see some data that shows that we have a
significant portion of the spammers are bots before we
even start thinking of captchas.
http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentChanges has all the details. Please
consider at least removing the spammers' accounts listed there,
2009/3/13 Dimi Paun :
> On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 01:59 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
>> Of course, complicated captchas don't keep out manually created spam
>> accounts, only bots.
> And I'll like to see some data that shows that we have a
> significant portion of the spammers are bots before we
> even st
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 01:59 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> Of course, complicated captchas don't keep out manually created spam
> accounts, only bots.
And I'll like to see some data that shows that we have a
significant portion of the spammers are bots before we
even start thinking of captchas.
--
D
2009/3/13 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> "Ben Klein" wrote:
>
> Another thing that would probably help to get rid of spammers' accounts
> is to (regularly) delete all user accounts without a personal page.
It would also get rid of anyone who did not want to create a home page.
>>
>> It wou
2009/3/12 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Spammers do "contribute" a lot lately to the Wine wiki, that's why this
> thread has appeared in the first place.
What are the numbers? Any action should be based on evidence.
> If a user has found a typo, probably he/she is aware of bugzilla or irc.
Or you cou
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
If a user has found a typo, probably he/she is aware of bugzilla or irc.
That's a lot thinking for a user to do given bugzilla is not an
intuitive approach to correcting grammar. There does not appear to be
an easy way to decide that a user is valid and spammers will cr
"Rosanne DiMesio" wrote:
> As I said having a short description what your intentions/activity is in
> the Wine project is enough, no burden/obligations to update it.
So, if a user notices a typo in the wiki and is nice enough to take
the time to correct it, you want to require them to also a
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> [...]
> > As I said having a short description what your intentions/activity is in
> > the Wine project is enough, no burden/obligations to update it.
>
So, if a user notices a typo in the wiki and is nice enough to take the time to
correct it, yo
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
> As I said having a short description what your intentions/activity is in
> the Wine project is enough, no burden/obligations to update it.
And unless you updated the list of what you usually work on and what you
intend to work on quickly become
"Ben Klein" wrote:
Another thing that would probably help to get rid of spammers' accounts
is to (regularly) delete all user accounts without a personal page.
It would also get rid of anyone who did not want to create a home page.
It would also attract spammers to creating personal pages.
"Francois Gouget" wrote:
What's the point in having a Wiki account then?
Being able to modify the Wiki pages.
Being notified of changes to specific Wiki pages.
As far as I know you cannot do that if you don't have an account. But
personally I really don't want yet one more home page to main
2009/3/12 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> [please don't forget to cc: wine-devel]
>
> "Jeff Latimer" wrote:
>
It would be also helpful to to get all wiki user account list (check it
time from time for suspicious names) and have an ability to delete
accounts
of known spammers for Wiki admi
2009/3/12 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Another thing that would probably help to get rid of spammers' accounts
> is to (regularly) delete all user accounts without a personal page.
Evidence-based actions would probably be a good idea. What are the
actual numbers?
- d.
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:58:42 +0800
"Dmitry Timoshkov" wrote:
> What's the point in having a Wiki account then?
>
I occasionally update the FAQ based on questions that seem to come up on the
forum repeatedly. And I really don't want a personal page.
--
Rosanne DiMesio
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
> > I just created one /just in case/ but really don't want to.
>
> What's the point in having a Wiki account then?
Being able to modify the Wiki pages.
Being notified of changes to specific Wiki pages.
As far as I know you cannot do that if you
[please don't forget to cc: wine-devel]
"Jeff Latimer" wrote:
It would be also helpful to to get all wiki user account list (check it
time from time for suspicious names) and have an ability to delete
accounts
of known spammers for Wiki admins. Is it possible?
Another thing that would proba
"Dmitry Timoshkov" wrote:
It would be also helpful to to get all wiki user account list (check it
time from time for suspicious names) and have an ability to delete accounts
of known spammers for Wiki admins. Is it possible?
Another thing that would probably help to get rid of spammers' accou
"Vitaliy Margolen" wrote:
Please disable file attachments on Wiki. There are no way to verify their
validity and for the past week it's been a constant source of spam.
IMHO file attachment does not belong on text only Wiki. If anyone needs to
attach a patch a two - they can link it to the one
to list as well
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Gerard
Date: 2009/3/11
Subject: Re: Disabling File attachments on Wiki
To: Dimi Paun
2009/3/11 Dimi Paun :
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:02 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Anyone? Also how about blockin
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:02 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Anyone? Also how about blocking this IP: 213.155.0.32 ?
Not sure how we can block that IP easily. If it has to do
with iptables, forget it.
--
Dimi Paun
Lattica, Inc.
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Please disable file attachments on Wiki. There are no way to verify their
> validity and for the past week it's been a constant source of spam.
>
> IMHO file attachment does not belong on text only Wiki. If anyone needs to
> attach a patch a two - they can link it to the
Please disable file attachments on Wiki. There are no way to verify their
validity and for the past week it's been a constant source of spam.
IMHO file attachment does not belong on text only Wiki. If anyone needs to
attach a patch a two - they can link it to the one in ML archives or even
bugzill
36 matches
Mail list logo
