Re: Development method

2005-05-04 Thread David Hemmo
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: Mike McCormack wrote: Try skip the 'make install', and instead run wine from the build directory. eg. I did it when I reinstalled Linux. The downside is that make is still slower that if you do it in the directory where you made a modification. The plus side is that it also

Re: Development method

2005-04-08 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
Mike McCormack wrote: Try skip the 'make install', and instead run wine from the build directory. eg. ~/src/wine/wine regedit I make a point of never installing Wine to make sure I don't accidently run an older installed version that didn't get overwritten properly. You can also just have a scri

Re: Development method

2005-04-08 Thread Mike McCormack
David Hemmo wrote: Right now, each time I make a modification (even one line) I do a 'make' followed by a 'make install'. Is there a faster way ? Try skip the 'make install', and instead run wine from the build directory. eg. ~/src/wine/wine regedit I make a point of never installing Wine to mak

Re: Development method

2005-04-08 Thread David Hemmo
I run these commands in the directory of the dll or program which I changed. Thats is way faster :-) Thanks David Hemmo

Re: Development method

2005-04-08 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Freitag, 8. April 2005 16:00 schrieb David Hemmo: > Hello, > > Right now, each time I make a modification (even one line) I do a > 'make' followed by a 'make install'. > Is there a faster way ? I run these commands in the directory of the dll or program which I changed. That is way faster(espec

Development method

2005-04-08 Thread David Hemmo
Hello, Right now, each time I make a modification (even one line) I do a 'make' followed by a 'make install'. Is there a faster way ? Thanks David Hemmo