On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:39:10 -0800, Duane Clark wrote:
> Well, okay maybe bug is the wrong word. But I see it all the time, for
> example when looking at msdn.microsoft.com, and it is rather annoying.
Yeah, but I wouldn't judge anything by looking at MSDN, it routinely feeds
broken IE specific H
Brian Vincent wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:37:18 -0800, Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I frankly think that is a bug in Mozilla/Firefox, but it has been
that way for a very long time. The width in the case of the above link
Actually, it will render that way in every browser because t
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:37:18 -0800, Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I frankly think that is a bug in Mozilla/Firefox, but it has been
> that way for a very long time. The width in the case of the above link
Actually, it will render that way in every browser because the
line has no br
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:37:18 -0800, Duane Clark wrote:
> Yes, I frankly think that is a bug in Mozilla/Firefox, but it has been
> that way for a very long time. The width in the case of the above link
> is being caused by the string in the +relay section beginning:
>RtlEnterCriticalSection;Rt
Dan Kegel wrote:
http://www.winehq.com/site/developer-cheatsheet is 1.5 times
as wide as my screen in Firefox and Mozilla. Seems
like it needs a bit of adjustment...
Yes, I frankly think that is a bug in Mozilla/Firefox, but it has been
that way for a very long time. The width in the case of the
http://www.winehq.com/site/developer-cheatsheet is 1.5 times
as wide as my screen in Firefox and Mozilla. Seems
like it needs a bit of adjustment...
--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See
http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
