2009/1/22 Austin English :
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
>>> Stupid gmail.
>>>
>>> 2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
Well, I've got wine/wine-dev/wine-dbg packages building right now :)
wine: ~
>>>
>>> wine: ~11MB
>>> wine-dev: ~2.5MB
>>> wine
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
>> Stupid gmail.
>>
>> 2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
>>> Well, I've got wine/wine-dev/wine-dbg packages building right now :)
>>>
>>> wine: ~
>>>
>>
>> wine: ~11MB
>> wine-dev: ~2.5MB
>> wine-dbg: ~22MB
>>
>> These are likely to be
2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
> Stupid gmail.
>
> 2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
>> Well, I've got wine/wine-dev/wine-dbg packages building right now :)
>>
>> wine: ~
>>
>
> wine: ~11MB
> wine-dev: ~2.5MB
> wine-dbg: ~22MB
>
> These are likely to be bigger on etch.
>
Wow, OK, not quite. Turns out I wasn't using lz
Stupid gmail.
2009/1/22 Ben Klein :
> Well, I've got wine/wine-dev/wine-dbg packages building right now :)
>
> wine: ~
>
wine: ~11MB
wine-dev: ~2.5MB
wine-dbg: ~22MB
These are likely to be bigger on etch.
Well, I've got wine/wine-dev/wine-dbg packages building right now :)
wine: ~
Ben Klein wrote:
>
> I've also been playing around with -Zlzma. I can only get my packages
> down to about 11MB, even with dev headers removed. Is there anything
> else you can think of that you've done differently or specially?
Nope. You can look at the source package if you like, it's possible
2009/1/18 Scott Ritchie :
> Ben Klein wrote:
>> Hi Maurilio,
>>
>> I see you've taken over building Lenny packages of Wine. Good work; at
>> least now there are *some* updated packages available.
>>
>> I talked to Scott a while ago about taking over from him for all
>> Debian package building. I ha
Ben Klein wrote:
> Hi Maurilio,
>
> I see you've taken over building Lenny packages of Wine. Good work; at
> least now there are *some* updated packages available.
>
> I talked to Scott a while ago about taking over from him for all
> Debian package building. I have an automated build environment
Lei Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Krombholz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Bryan Roberts
>> wrote:
>>> I'm puzzled by the sizes of the packages. Packages for Debian by Maurilio
>>> and James are 13-14 Mb to download whereas Ubuntu packages by Scott ar
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Krombholz
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Bryan Roberts
> wrote:
>> I'm puzzled by the sizes of the packages. Packages for Debian by Maurilio
>> and James are 13-14 Mb to download whereas Ubuntu packages by Scott are only
>> 7-8 Mb. Anyone
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2. Ubuntu debs are lzma compressed, while those for Debian are gzip'ed.
>
> I'd expect this wouldn't make a big difference.
Indeed, it does:
/home/src/wine-git$ prefix=/tmp/wine-test make -e install
...
/home/src/wine-git$ cd /tmp
/tmp$ du -sh
2009/1/17 Bjoern Krombholz :
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Bryan Roberts
> wrote:
>> I'm puzzled by the sizes of the packages. Packages for Debian by Maurilio
>> and James are 13-14 Mb to download whereas Ubuntu packages by Scott are only
>> 7-8 Mb. Anyone see any reason for this ?
>
On Fr, 2009-01-16 at 07:11 +, Paul Bryan Roberts wrote:
> I'm puzzled by the sizes of the packages.
> Packages for Debian by Maurilio and James are 13-14 Mb to download
> whereas Ubuntu packages by Scott are only 7-8 Mb. Anyone see any reason for
> this ?
deb support different compression ty
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Bryan Roberts
wrote:
> I'm puzzled by the sizes of the packages. Packages for Debian by Maurilio
> and James are 13-14 Mb to download whereas Ubuntu packages by Scott are only
> 7-8 Mb. Anyone see any reason for this ?
1. Ubuntu debs are split into a base
Maurilio is doing a great job providing Lenny packages for Wine.
The site at http://wine.x.pl has been providing Wine packages for Etch for some
time. x86 only I'm afraid. The site's author is very modest but I believe
it's a chap named James Huk who used to send messages to the wine-user mail
Hi Maurilio,
I see you've taken over building Lenny packages of Wine. Good work; at
least now there are *some* updated packages available.
I talked to Scott a while ago about taking over from him for all
Debian package building. I have an automated build environment that
builds packages for all v
Sorry about this email wrong list.
On 7/12/07, Marcelo Boveto Shima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Karl!
I added lots of missing dependency on the debian packages. Would be nice
to have the binary updated.
This should fix lots of rsvg missing dependency.
Regards
Marcelo Shima
Hello Karl!
I added lots of missing dependency on the debian packages. Would be nice to
have the binary updated.
This should fix lots of rsvg missing dependency.
Regards
Marcelo Shima
)
> >
> > I found a little typo on the download site for the debian packages. The
> > link to the repository works for me only without the space:
> >
> > deb http://wine.sourceforge.net/apt/ binary/
> >
> > should be:
> >
> > deb http://wine.so
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:20:47AM +0100, Stefan Munz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know who who is responsible for maintaining the website, but probably
> he will read wine-devel ;-)
>
> I found a little typo on the download site for the debian packages. The link
> t
Hi,
I don't know who who is responsible for maintaining the website, but probably
he will read wine-devel ;-)
I found a little typo on the download site for the debian packages. The link
to the repository works for me only without the space:
deb http://wine.sourceforge.net/apt/ b
Hi,
the debian packages (http://wine.sf.net/apt/) are still stuck at
20050725. I have failed to contact the maintainer, Scott Ritchie.
Does anyone know whether he is still dedicated to building the packages?
regards,
Daniel
Debian packages are almost done. I have them up for testing.
Add the following to /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://tuzakey.com/~scott/ binary/
deb-src http://tuzakey.com/~scott/ source/
My friend's webserver can't handle the huge bandwidth permanent hosting
of packages like this wi
Le mar 14/10/2003 à 13:05, Martin Troester a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> is there a reason that the for the Wine .dll.so libraries are not
> contained in the Wine Debian packages, especially libwine-dev? I mean,
> if I develop Winelib applications, I am going to need them anyway...
That
Hi,
is there a reason that the for the Wine .dll.so libraries are not
contained in the Wine Debian packages, especially libwine-dev? I mean,
if I develop Winelib applications, I am going to need them anyway...
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Martin
25 matches
Mail list logo
