Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre: I said at the time we should apply the patch I sent but disable
> it, so it doesn't get lost/forgotten about. Here's another reason we
> should do that - it'll stop people reimplementing what has already been
> done.
I'm not going to commit non-
Hi Ken,
I'm really sorry about this but I already implemented LockWindowUpdate
about a month or two ago. Unfortunately it is blocking on moving
invalidation handling into the wineserver, and was not applied.
So, I'm afraid that (a) the work has already been done and (b) the patch
you sent, is wro
