Mike Hearn wrote:
As for Cedega/WineX - well, they have a big lead in gaming, but I'd like
to think that one day Wine will be the swiss-army knife of Windows
emulation. Regular Wine does have DX support, we should work on that
rather than be distracted by a pseudo-proprietary fork.
thanks -mike
I w
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 16:15:53 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> One could just offer a script that toggles the version of Wine being
> used. Click on the script, dialog box pops up "Windows programs will
> now be launched using Wine[X]", and maybe some more information
> regarding the suitability for
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 03:47:40AM +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
> What binary is going to be invoked when the user double-clicks, if
> different applications need to be run with different versions/types of
> Wine?
One could just offer a script that toggles the version of Wine being
used. Cli
Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
find that it doesn't necessarily "feel strange" or at least as strange
as I might have imagined. What mostly feels strange is the complications
of getting the program started in the first place (having to cd to
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> find that it doesn't necessarily "feel strange" or at least as strange
> as I might have imagined. What mostly feels strange is the complications
> of getting the program started in the first place (having to cd to the
> applicat
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:26:21 -0800, Jim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you indeed Dan! If I encounter Mike Hearn yet again with his
> "Darwine is Pointless" arguments I can sed 's/Wine/Darwine/ s/Linux/Mac
> OS X/' in reply to him.
Huh?
I just went back through the archives and couldn'
Holly Bostick wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
I've run into people several times who dislike the
fact that I advocate or even work on the Wine project,
...
Dan
Dan, first of all, thanks for writing that dowm.
Thank you indeed Dan! If I encounter Mike Hearn yet again with his
"Darwine is Pointless" argume
Brian Vincent wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:40:38 -0700, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.kegel.com/wine/why.html
These aren't exactly buried, but they're not obvious either:
http://www.winehq.com/site/myths
http://www.winehq.com/site/why
I had a link to the 2nd one, now I've got a l
Holly Bostick wrote:
I've got Wine running, and installed several programs I was familiar
with under Windows, mostly to perform tasks that I couldn't figure out
how to do under Linux, but which I either knew how to perform using
Windows apps, or could find HOW-TOs for that specified Windows apps
Dan Kegel wrote:
I've run into people several times who dislike the
fact that I advocate or even work on the Wine project,
because they feel that it takes focus away from
working on the Linux desktop. I beg to differ, but
I've never had a really snappy comeback for them.
It happened again today, a
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:40:38 -0700, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run into people several times who dislike the
> fact that I advocate or even work on the Wine project,
> because they feel that it takes focus away from
> working on the Linux desktop. I beg to differ, but
> I've never
I've run into people several times who dislike the
fact that I advocate or even work on the Wine project,
because they feel that it takes focus away from
working on the Linux desktop. I beg to differ, but
I've never had a really snappy comeback for them.
It happened again today, and this time it o
12 matches
Mail list logo
