Re: Configuration parameters

2003-11-22 Thread Eric Pouech
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On September 23, 2003 02:47 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: didn't search hard enough in fact, I was searching in Win9x, where it isn't present, and only configured in .ini files. In NT, they seem to be stored in for win.ini in HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\MCI E

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-11-21 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 23, 2003 02:47 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: > didn't search hard enough > in fact, I was searching in Win9x, where it isn't present, and only > configured in .ini files. > In NT, they seem to be stored in > > for win.ini in > HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\MCI Extensions >

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Eric Pouech
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Eric Pouech wrote: What about the stuff in win.ini/[mci extensions]. Is that used? yes, in some internal mci function (but that doesn't need to be changed by end users. we just need to list the default extensions for the given mci playback. I haven't

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Eric Pouech wrote: > > What about the stuff in win.ini/[mci extensions]. Is that used? > yes, in some internal mci function (but that doesn't need to be changed > by end users. we just need to list the default extensions for the given > mci playback. I haven't found yet an e

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Eric Pouech
Mike Hearn wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:50, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On September 18, 2003 01:26 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: the point is that it's not easy to tell between : - two physical sound cards (one ALSA, one OSS) - one physical sound card but with ALSA and OSS emulation on top of ALSA more

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Eric Pouech
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On September 18, 2003 01:26 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: the point is that it's not easy to tell between : - two physical sound cards (one ALSA, one OSS) - one physical sound card but with ALSA and OSS emulation on top of ALSA moreover, we'll have to store winmm card information

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Francois Gouget wrote: > Do you mean to remove the option altogether and hard-code it to > 'managed'? That was the intention at the time. I've changed it since to regedit -- it's good enough for now. I am aware of the Z-order problems, hopefully we'll get most apps to work in

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-23 Thread Francois Gouget
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: [...] > -- Do everybody agree with the "Needed" column? Most importantly, > do you see items marked as "cfg" that shouldn't, or items that > are not marked as "cfg" and they should? Please take a few min > to review the list, so we can h

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-22 Thread Mike Hearn
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:50, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On September 18, 2003 01:26 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: > > > the point is that it's not easy to tell between : > > - two physical sound cards (one ALSA, one OSS) > > - one physical sound card but with ALSA and OSS emulation on top of ALSA > > more

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-21 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 18, 2003 01:26 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: > the point is that it's not easy to tell between : > - two physical sound cards (one ALSA, one OSS) > - one physical sound card but with ALSA and OSS emulation on top of ALSA > moreover, we'll have to store winmm card information to dsound driver

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-18 Thread Eric Pouech
[WinMM] Drivers regedt no no WaveMapper regedt no no msacm.drv MidiMapper regedt no no midimap.drv will need in the future a more robust configuration scheme, especially if we want to get rid of the hacks to pair MM devices and dsound devices. By to you mean a default value has to be computed b

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Eric Pouech wrote: > Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > > Name Needed Dynamic PerApp Default value > > [Drive X] > > Path cfg yes no > > Type cfg yes no > > Label cfg yes no > > Serial cfg yes no > > Filesystem cfg yes no > > Device cfg yes no > I don't quite agree on the "yes" flag fo

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Eric Pouech
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: Name Needed Dynamic PerApp Default value [Drive X] Path cfg yes no Type cfg yes no Label cfg yes no Serial cfg yes no Filesystem cfg yes no Device cfg yes no I don't quite agree on the "yes" flag for dynamicity. (Unless I don't understand the same thing as you do regarding

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:30, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > > * UseDGA > > This will be useful the day the DGA driver will have been fixed. Also the > day we will use DGA mouse to have nice relative mouse grabbing :-) Yeah, sure, that's why I wanted it in the registry. It's broke. When it is fixed, we can

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Lionel Ulmer
> * UseDGA This will be useful the day the DGA driver will have been fixed. Also the day we will use DGA mouse to have nice relative mouse grabbing :-) > * DesktopDoubleBuffered (not sure about this one) Well, I think we should put this as True as default. At least, I never heard any report of i

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Huw D M Davies
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:34:59AM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On September 17, 2003 08:25 am, Huw D M Davies wrote: > > > * Spooler - isn't CUPS meant to take care of that? > > > > It does if the system has cups. It's still needed for non-cups > > printers though. > > Right, but can we leav

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Mike Hearn
Cool! Just a few things - there are some settings marked as being for winecfg that I don't think we really should have there. In particular: * UseDGA * GraphicsDriver * ShellLinker * DesktopDoubleBuffered (not sure about this one) * Fonts/fontdirs - after Huw merges his crossover patches these sh

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 17, 2003 08:25 am, Huw D M Davies wrote: > > * Spooler - isn't CUPS meant to take care of that? > > It does if the system has cups. It's still needed for non-cups > printers though. Right, but can we leave the non-cups to regedit? How common are cups systems, and most importantly, wh

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 17, 2003 07:40 am, Mike Hearn wrote: > Cool! > > Just a few things - there are some settings marked as being for winecfg > that I don't think we really should have there. In particular: > > * UseDGA I thought this is interesting for games. But have you figured when we use this thing (

Re: Configuration parameters

2003-09-17 Thread Huw D M Davies
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:40:20PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > Cool! > > Just a few things - there are some settings marked as being for winecfg > that I don't think we really should have there. In particular: > > * Fonts/fontdirs - after Huw merges his crossover patches these should > become auto

Configuration parameters

2003-09-16 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Hi folks, I've finally managed to do the table I've promised for so long. My appologies for the delay. This has been mind numbing work, and as such I haven't payed that much attention to the values I've filled in those columns. Please send me your comments so I can post a final version of this to