Re: Compiling wine on an x86-64 system

2006-05-30 Thread Pavel Troller
Hi Rob! > > There are quite a few places that use i386 syscalls directly and you > just fixed the one place it was detected. What you need to do is to copy > a 32-bit unistd.h to asm-i386/unistd.h and make sure that it is included > correctly by asm/unistd.h. > Many thanks for your explanati

Re: Compiling wine on an x86-64 system

2006-05-29 Thread Robert Shearman
Pavel Troller wrote: Hi! I would like to ask for a help with wine compilation on an x86_64 system. Today I successfully did the compilation, but the result is totally unusable. I've supplied -m32 switch to both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (I have to specify my own C/LDFLAGS because of custom -I/-L opt

Re: Compiling wine on an x86-64 system

2006-05-29 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Pavel Troller wrote: > I would like to ask for a help with wine compilation on an x86_64 system. http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit bye michael > Today I successfully did the compilation, but the result is totally > unusable. > I've supplied -m32 switch to both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (

Re: Compiling wine on an x86-64 system

2006-05-29 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hi Pavel, One thing to consider is where gcc finds your X libraries. Wine knows its on a x86_64 system and supplies the -m32 itself. Of course, you will have to watch out for missing required packages reported by configure (bison, flex libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel, cups-devel, fontforge, freetype2

Compiling wine on an x86-64 system

2006-05-29 Thread Pavel Troller
Hi! I would like to ask for a help with wine compilation on an x86_64 system. Today I successfully did the compilation, but the result is totally unusable. I've supplied -m32 switch to both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (I have to specify my own C/LDFLAGS because of custom -I/-L options to find various