On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:28 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few
>> new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I
>> starte
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few
> new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I
> started to write a patch to remove the check, since it's useless, but
> wasn't sure i
I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few
new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I
started to write a patch to remove the check, since it's useless, but
wasn't sure if it should instead be converted to a signed integer
instead.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
