On Dec 27, 2007 11:10 AM, Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 7:27 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This stuff has nothing to do in the code, particularly not in the
> > loader. If you want to check the result of configure you should look at
> > config.l
On Dec 27, 2007 7:27 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This stuff has nothing to do in the code, particularly not in the
> loader. If you want to check the result of configure you should look at
> config.log. If you want to know whether a given feature is supported,
> you should t
"Zachary Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been checking recently, haven't seen any further discussion on
> this patch, or seen it be committed. Any thoughts on why? I'm
> curious because I think its useful, and because I wrote a WWN article
> on it -- which of course only makes sense
I've been checking recently, haven't seen any further discussion on
this patch, or seen it be committed. Any thoughts on why? I'm
curious because I think its useful, and because I wrote a WWN article
on it -- which of course only makes sense if the patch is applied :).
--
Zachary Goldberg
Compu
