Re: Compilation broken in CVS

2004-01-09 Thread Paul Millar
Hi Mike, On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Mike Hearn wrote: > Marcus submitted a patch for this. Should be fixed soon, it's just a silly > typo. Cool. > That tinderbox type thing is realy cool by the way! :) Thanks! I'm just putting some final touches and regression testing the code. Once they're done, I

Re: Compilation broken in CVS

2004-01-09 Thread Jeremy Shaw
Gah! Correction, you should use it in addition to Marcus' patch. Jeremy, airhead, Shaw. At Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:26:19 -0800, Jeremy Shaw wrote: > > Ack! > > I did test my patch before sending in it, but I am a doofus. I made > the changes in one copy of the source tree, but compiled and tested

Re: Compilation broken in CVS

2004-01-09 Thread Jeremy Shaw
Ack! I did test my patch before sending in it, but I am a doofus. I made the changes in one copy of the source tree, but compiled and tested a different copy of the source tree. So I didn't actually test the patch at all!! grr! Here is a patch to fix things. You should use this patch instead of

Re: Compilation broken in CVS

2004-01-09 Thread Mike Hearn
Hi Paul, Marcus submitted a patch for this. Should be fixed soon, it's just a silly typo. That tinderbox type thing is realy cool by the way! :)

Compilation broken in CVS

2004-01-09 Thread Paul Millar
Hi everyone, Looks like one of the patches broke compiling last night: http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/buildinfo.php?id=472 I get error messages like: gcc -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic,-z,defs,-init,__wine_spec_init,-fini,__wine_spec_fini winearts.drv.spec.oarts.o audio.o winearts.