Hi Mike,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Marcus submitted a patch for this. Should be fixed soon, it's just a silly
> typo.
Cool.
> That tinderbox type thing is realy cool by the way! :)
Thanks! I'm just putting some final touches and regression testing the
code. Once they're done, I
Gah!
Correction, you should use it in addition to Marcus' patch.
Jeremy, airhead, Shaw.
At Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:26:19 -0800,
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>
> Ack!
>
> I did test my patch before sending in it, but I am a doofus. I made
> the changes in one copy of the source tree, but compiled and tested
Ack!
I did test my patch before sending in it, but I am a doofus. I made
the changes in one copy of the source tree, but compiled and tested a
different copy of the source tree. So I didn't actually test the patch
at all!!
grr!
Here is a patch to fix things. You should use this patch instead of
Hi Paul,
Marcus submitted a patch for this. Should be fixed soon, it's just a silly
typo. That tinderbox type thing is realy cool by the way! :)
Hi everyone,
Looks like one of the patches broke compiling last night:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/buildinfo.php?id=472
I get error messages like:
gcc -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic,-z,defs,-init,__wine_spec_init,-fini,__wine_spec_fini
winearts.drv.spec.oarts.o audio.o winearts.