On Mi, 2007-03-14 at 09:07 -0700, Lei Zhang wrote:
> BTW, are we evert going to put up a better front page for
> test.winehq.org?
> It still says 403 Forbidden.
Yes Please: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3187
--
By by ... Detlef
"Lei Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a good question. The class the students are taking will be over
by the end of next week. I've tried to help them get it right the
first time by running their tests on several different Windows
platforms and making sure the tests pass on all of them.
On 3/14/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alex Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a two part patch. The first part is status_reorganization.patch
> which divides the test routine into function calls. The second part is
> status_messages.patch which adds message sequenci
"Alex Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a two part patch. The first part is status_reorganization.patch
which divides the test routine into function calls. The second part is
status_messages.patch which adds message sequencing.
Are you guys planning to monitor test.winehq.org and fix
On 2/10/07, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Arazi wrote:
> -ok(rc.top == 2, "Expected 2, got %d\n", rc.top);
> -ok(rc.bottom == 21, "Expected 21, got %d\n", rc.bottom);
> -ok(rc.left == 0, "Expected 0, got %d\n", rc.left);
> -ok(rc.right == 50, "Expected 50, got %d
Alex Arazi wrote:
-ok(rc.top == 2, "Expected 2, got %d\n", rc.top);
-ok(rc.bottom == 21, "Expected 21, got %d\n", rc.bottom);
-ok(rc.left == 0, "Expected 0, got %d\n", rc.left);
-ok(rc.right == 50, "Expected 50, got %d\n", rc.right);
I didn't really look at your new tests but th
