On 3/23/06, Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uhoh, with my own little server problem I now seem to have startedsome wildfire...No, no wildfire here. I'm still one of those heathens using CVS too.What I meant was use git to clone the existing git repository to the local rhlx01box. Then I n
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:03:09AM -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Welll... not quite: the very high FC5 download number is not the problem,
> > rather the server got upgraded a couple days ago (to FC5, too), which
> > broke
> > cvsup (
On 3/23/06, Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welll... not quite: the very high FC5 download number is not the problem,rather the server got upgraded a couple days ago (to FC5, too), which brokecvsup (SEGV).
Would it be worth skipping cvsup and moving to git?
-Brian
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:53AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> I'll try to get cvs synched again manually (just doing it more often),
> but no promises since the pipe (or shaping or whatever) is pretty much
> bursting and thus it may not be overly successful...
>
> Thanks for the report, it'
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:09:17PM +0100, Sven Paschukat wrote:
> Does anyone know what's wrong with the CVS server
> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de in Europe? It's out of sync for a few days now.
Hmpf. Now that's why I was getting the "CVS problem" mails slightly more
often than normal...
There's
Does anyone know what's wrong with the CVS server
rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de in Europe? It's out of sync for a few days now.
Sven
