On Monday 18 June 2007 11:35:27 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> What's the long term plan for an LSB build of wine? Would we drop the
> dozen or so different distro packages and have 1 official binary, like
> samba is supposedly planning to do?
While I don't know what Wine's plans for this are, I'm 100
On 6/17/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the Linux Summit, a bunch of us decided it'd be a good
idea to try out lsbcc on more real-world packages, so I tried wine
again tonight. My previous try was described here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-August/050554.html
In
At the Linux Summit, a bunch of us decided it'd be a good
idea to try out lsbcc on more real-world packages, so I tried wine
again tonight. My previous try was described here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-August/050554.html
This time I used Feisty Fawn's lsb build env packages
On 8/27/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been a longtime fan of the idea behind the LSB,
i.e. build once, run everywhere. (If you're an anti-fan of
the LSB, please kindly skip this message.)
I should mention that I don't really expect this to be troublefree yet.
Rather, I'm gather
I've been a longtime fan of the idea behind the LSB,
i.e. build once, run everywhere. (If you're an anti-fan of
the LSB, please kindly skip this message.)
So tonight I downloaded the current LSB SDK from
http://www.freestandards.org/en/Download
and gave it a shot. Here's the script I came up wi
