Re: BuildCommDCB conformance test

2003-09-12 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Kevin Groeneveld wrote: > Here is my first attempt at a conformance test for the BuildCommDCB > functions. It does not cover very many cases yet, but I thought I would > post what I have so far in case I am going about this the wrong way. Just a small pick: could you modify

Re: BuildCommDCB conformance test

2003-09-11 Thread Kevin Groeneveld
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On September 11, 2003 01:32 am, Kevin Groeneveld wrote: If my previous patch to BuildCommDCB is applied, then the test runs ok. Looks good. Send it over to wine-patches to be included in the tree. It's good to know I am on the right track. I want to add some more test

Re: BuildCommDCB conformance test

2003-09-11 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Kevin Groeneveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is my first attempt at a conformance test for the BuildCommDCB > functions. It does not cover very many cases yet, but I thought I would > post what I have so far in case I am going about this the wrong way. > > I compiled this with MSVC and i

Re: BuildCommDCB conformance test

2003-09-11 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 11, 2003 01:32 am, Kevin Groeneveld wrote: > If my previous patch to BuildCommDCB is applied, then the test runs ok. Looks good. Send it over to wine-patches to be included in the tree. -- Dimi.

BuildCommDCB conformance test

2003-09-10 Thread Kevin Groeneveld
Here is my first attempt at a conformance test for the BuildCommDCB functions. It does not cover very many cases yet, but I thought I would post what I have so far in case I am going about this the wrong way. I compiled this with MSVC and it ran with no errors on both Windows 95 and Windows 2000.