Tony Lambregts wrote:
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Francois Gouget wrote:
[...]
But it would be nice if there was an easy way to find bugs that have a
patch, even, and maybe especially, if it is incorrect. This would make
it easier for interested parties to survey what p
Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Francois Gouget wrote:
> [...]
>> But it would be nice if there was an easy way to find bugs that have a
>> patch, even, and maybe especially, if it is incorrect. This would make
>> it easier for interested parties to survey what potential fixes are
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> Since nobody else jumped on this, I went ahead and added a "patch"
> keyword.
Argh!
So now I finally discover that after all it is possible to use the query
system to get a list of the bugs that have patches. So we don't need
the 'patch' keyword :-/ S
Since nobody else jumped on this, I went ahead and added a "patch"
keyword.
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 19:48 +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Francois Gouget wrote:
> [...]
> > But it would be nice if there was an easy way to find bugs that have a
> > patch, even, and maybe especia
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Francois Gouget wrote:
[...]
> But it would be nice if there was an easy way to find bugs that have a
> patch, even, and maybe especially, if it is incorrect. This would make
> it easier for interested parties to survey what potential fixes are
> languishing in Bugzilla and
During a query I've stumbled on bug 5012 which happens to have a patch
attached to it. Nine months ago it was suggested to the author to send
this patch to wine-patches but either he didn't do it or it was not
accepted.
Now, I don't consider myself qualified to judge the patch and I have no
p
