Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:56:30 +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Damn, had to miss it. Any impressions from the event? IRC logs?
It was pretty good, a lot of people showed up which was fantastic. I was a
bit disappointed that those people were mostly already experienced Wine
developers
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:56:30 +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Damn, had to miss it. Any impressions from the event? IRC logs?
It was pretty good, a lot of people showed up which was fantastic. I was a
bit disappointed that those people were mostly already experienced Wine
developers, I was hoping t
On Monday 06 December 2004 12:56, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Damn, had to miss it. Any impressions from the event? IRC logs?
I was there mainly to log the discussion :)
[I've no time to put on wine at the moment, but I hope to have more in the
future]
http://flameeyes.web.ctonet.it/WineBugBusters.lo
Mike Hearn wrote:
Likewise, if you're wanting to get into Wine hacking but aren't sure where
to start, or started but got stuck, or just have questions to ask those
who already climbed the learning curve then this is a great chance.
You don't have to be a developer, feel free to come and watch even
if
you're just interested in seeing how it's done.
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:09:07 -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
> The first ever Wine Bug Busters hacking session is coming up in an
> hour - 7pm GMT or 2pm EST for you North American folks. A few people
> are already sitting in irc.
The first ever Wine Bug Busters hacking session is coming up in an
hour - 7pm GMT or 2pm EST for you North American folks. A few people
are already sitting in irc. If you want to join, fire up your
favorite IRC and log into irc.freenode.net, channel #winehackers.
-Brian
; James Hawkins wrote:
> > > I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
> > > where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
> > > together on #winehackers (or some other channel). We would pick a bug
> > > (or maybe mor
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:29:50 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
agree that programs should be freely available to anyone if the bug
requires a program. Some of the bugs don't need them. I also agree
that the older bugs should be fixed first. We might even find that a
bunch of bugs we
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:42:26 +, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:27 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > > So that the most potential developers will be able to join, let's have
> > > the session this Friday Dec. 3, 7pm GMT. Is that a good time for
>
> I think Sunda
Robert van Herk wrote:
Also, I am getting the strange feeling that the buglist is somewhat
outdated :-). For example: almost all bugs are either NEW or
UNCONFIRMED. Isn't that a bit odd?
It's just that way right now. The way Bugzilla was designed there is supposed to
be a default person for eac
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:27 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > So that the most potential developers will be able to join, let's have
> > the session this Friday Dec. 3, 7pm GMT. Is that a good time for
I think Sunday would be a better day of the week. Friday/Saturday nights
people tend to go out on
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:25:38 -0500, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:04:49 +, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:52 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > > What time is best for everyone? Also is once a week too much or not
> > >
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:04:49 +, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:52 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > What time is best for everyone? Also is once a week too much or not
> > enough?
>
> I think as long as both USians and Europeans can be awake at the same
> time,
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 09:24 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with fixing a bug for its own sake and any bug we fix
> will ultimately improve wine and provide some insites into debugging
> wine.
Well, yes if you assume infinite manpower. We don't have that so I'd
personally
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:54:59 +, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:29:50 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
>
> Well, as long as it's at a time I can do without having redeye the next
> day I'm happy to drop in and help with this. On choices of bugs:
>
> I think if this g
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:52 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> What time is best for everyone? Also is once a week too much or not
> enough?
I think as long as both USians and Europeans can be awake at the same
time, it should be that sort of time. So evening GMT. Before saying
"let's do it once a wee
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:29:50 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
agree that programs should be freely available to anyone if the bug
requires a program. Some of the bugs don't need them. I also agree
that the older bugs should be fixed first. We might even find that a
bunch of bugs
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:29:50 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
agree that programs should be freely available to anyone if the bug
requires a program. Some of the bugs don't need them. I also agree
that the older bugs should be fixed first. We might even find that a
bunch of bugs we
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
together on #winehackers (or some other channel). We would pick a bug
(or maybe more) from wine's bug tracker and
James Hawkins wrote:
I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
together on #winehackers (or some other channel). We would pick a bug
(or maybe more) from wine's bug tracker and work together to fix the
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:29:50 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> agree that programs should be freely available to anyone if the bug
> requires a program. Some of the bugs don't need them. I also agree
> that the older bugs should be fixed first. We might even find that a
> bunch of bugs we try to fi
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:23:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:59 -0500, Adam Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>James Hawkins wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
James Hawkins wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:59 -0500, Adam Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
together on #winehackers (or some
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:59 -0500, Adam Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>
>
> > I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
> > where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
> > together on #w
James Hawkins wrote:
I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
together on #winehackers (or some other channel). We would pick a bug
(or maybe more) from wine's bug tracker and work together to fix the
I have a totally non-original idea for sessions called Bug Busters
where, at a designated time, a group of wine developers would get
together on #winehackers (or some other channel). We would pick a bug
(or maybe more) from wine's bug tracker and work together to fix the
bug(s). This would
26 matches
Mail list logo
