Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-20 Thread Joris Huizer
I'm a bit confused, how can there be failures under windows? is this because of driver problems? regards, Joris

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-19 Thread Dimi Paun
From: "Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thanks for the feed back guy's, I've made a couple small changes since > my last message. Does the current page look better now? If i put the > percentage change in another column do you think it will confuse > people who don't know what the percentages ar

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-19 Thread Tom Wickline
On 1/17/06, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That would be great, but please don't create another page. > Just add one more column at the end (that would hold just > the percentage difference of the old test), and put N/A for > tests that were not run/available in 20050419. Dimi, Chris Th

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Aric Cyr
Tom Wickline gmail.com> writes: > > On 1/17/06, Tom Wickline gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Please take with a large dose of salt. > > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.5 > > Add more salt, I have the 3dmark2000 result browser installed and can > get scores from full screen runs now.

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:22 -0500, Dimi Paun wrote: > From: "Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was going to put the new results next to the old wine results, but I > > re-ran some of the test on XP as well because wine will run the HDD > > test in pcmark04 now. I can put up a page with 200504

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Dimi Paun
From: "Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was going to put the new results next to the old wine results, but I > re-ran some of the test on XP as well because wine will run the HDD > test in pcmark04 now. I can put up a page with 20050419 results vs > 0.9.5 ?? That would be great, but please d

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Tom Wickline
On 1/17/06, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Please take with a large dose of salt. > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.5 Add more salt, I have the 3dmark2000 result browser installed and can get scores from full screen runs now. > > Tom

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Tom Wickline
On 1/17/06, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We appear to be faster now, leading in 67 tests vs. 63 for a previous > set of benchmarks? Its difficult to see the trend over time having to > go back and forth between pages. > > Chris There is going to be a rather significant change taking

Re: Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Chris Morgan
We appear to be faster now, leading in 67 tests vs. 63 for a previous set of benchmarks? Its difficult to see the trend over time having to go back and forth between pages. Chris On 1/17/06, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Please take with a large dose of salt. > http://wik

Benchmarks for 0.9.5

2006-01-17 Thread Tom Wickline
Hello, Please take with a large dose of salt. http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.5 Tom -- Pain needs not cry for me...