Re: Bad recommended package lists

2008-04-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes. At first glance I'd say audiofile, freeglut-devel, libtiff-devel, > prelink (or maybe at the RPM package level), audiofile-devel, > libicu-devel (not used anymore), imake. prelink is needed, it's used to set the load address of system dlls. --

Re: Bad recommended package lists

2008-04-29 Thread Francois Gouget
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...] > > Here's a list of the suspicious or downright bad package > > recommendations I spotted: > > Quite a number of them seems just be indirect dependencies, except perhaps > isdn4k-utils. But do we care about indirect dependencies? We shouldn't ha

Re: Bad recommended package lists

2008-04-29 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:53:51PM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/Recommended_Packages > > The Wiki's Recommended Packages list contains a lot of incorrect > recommendations. I have already cleaned up the Debian section, but there > seems to be a lot of copy/paste that

Bad recommended package lists

2008-04-28 Thread Francois Gouget
http://wiki.winehq.org/Recommended_Packages The Wiki's Recommended Packages list contains a lot of incorrect recommendations. I have already cleaned up the Debian section, but there seems to be a lot of copy/paste that spread the bad information to the RPM distros. So we'd need volunteers for