Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2432
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2433
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2430
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2431
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2429
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23747
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23751
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23748
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23750
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23749
Your paranoid android
Hi,
On 10/01/12 13:07, Julian Rüger wrote:
Hi Francois,
- * size [I] How much percent of cache space should be free.
+ * size [I] How many percents of the cache should be free.
Maybe something like "Precentage of cache that should be free" would
sound more natural. Howe
Hi Francois,
> - * size [I] How much percent of cache space should be free.
> + * size [I] How many percents of the cache should be free.
Maybe something like "Precentage of cache that should be free" would
sound more natural. However I'm not sure of the intended meaning her
Hi Francois,
> -/* if we set the bufferpointer to NULL here UrlUnescape fails and
> string gets not converted */
> +/* if we set the buffer pointer to NULL here UrlUnescape fails and
> the string is not converted */
for consistency with the other buffer pointer comments and be
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21742
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13664
Your paranoid android
Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> [...]
>>> -rem Removing non-existent directory
>>> +rem Removing nonexistent directory
> [...]
>> There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
>> and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "non-"
The errors reported by testbot are not related to this patch.
Should I resent a version without the "failing" hunks?
Frédéric
On 8/3/11 4:23 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
-rem Removing non-existent directory
+rem Removing nonexistent directory
[...]
There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "no
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13256
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13249
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13236
Your paranoid android
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> > -rem Removing non-existent directory
> > +rem Removing nonexistent directory
[...]
> There is apparently no hard rule on the usage of hypens between 'non'
> and a subsequent adjective, but I've seen lots of "non-" (sometimes
> even "non ") so I
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:36, Francois Gouget wrote:
> diff --git a/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> b/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> index eb79fb2..be1eead 100644
> --- a/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> +++ b/programs/cmd/tests/test_builtins.cmd
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ mkdir f
2008/12/28 Francois Gouget :
> -FIXME("No free constant found to load environemnt bump mapping
> matrix into the shader. texbem instruction will not apply bump mapping\n");
> +FIXME("No free constant found to load environement bump mapping
> matrix into the shader. texbem
This patch does not apply for me, I get the following errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/httpd/html/winehq_org$ git am ~/Downloads/patch.eml
Applying Assorted spelling fixes.
.dotest/patch:38: trailing whitespace.
between GDI/USER and the KERNEL, that is not absolutely needed, must be
.dotest
On Thursday 24 January 2008 23:25:53 Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > > English, at least in England.
> > > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
> >
> > I've never seen i
On Jan 24, 2008 4:25 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > > English, at least in England.
> > > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
> >
> > I've neve
On Jan 24, 2008 2:20 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
> > English, at least in England.
> > Guess I need to add that to stop.txt.
>
> I've never seen it used personally.
My test for whether a word is commonly used is
On Jan 24, 2008 1:37 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin wrote:
> >-/* centred vertically and in the right side of the password edit
> control */
> >+/* centered vertically and in the right side of the password
> edit control */
>
> I never thought about it before, but "centre
Austin wrote:
>-/* centred vertically and in the right side of the password edit
control */
>+/* centered vertically and in the right side of the password
edit control */
I never thought about it before, but "centred" is perfectly fine
English, at least in England.
Guess I need to add that
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, H. Verbeet wrote:
> On 07/12/2007, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- a/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> > - * out. The nvidia driver only does that if the parameter is inout
> > instead of out, hence the
> > - *
On 07/12/2007, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> +++ b/dlls/wined3d/glsl_shader.c
> - * out. The nvidia driver only does that if the parameter is inout
> instead of out, hence the
> - * inout.
> + * out. The nvidia driver only d
s/concensus/consensus
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Filip Navara wrote:
> Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> >Index: wwn/wn20041015_244.xml
> >===
> >RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20041015_244.xml,v
> >retrieving revision 1.1
> >diff -u -r1.1 w
Francois Gouget wrote:
Index: wwn/wn20041015_244.xml
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20041015_244.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 wn20041015_244.xml
--- wwn/wn20041015_244.xml 15 Oct 2004 03:59:52 - 1.1
+++ wwn/w
34 matches
Mail list logo
