On 2/22/11 10:44 PM, Tom Wickline wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, James McKenzie
mailto:jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
On 2/22/11 4:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
James McKenziemailto:jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net>> writes:
First, my tirade was not int
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
> On 2/22/11 4:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> James McKenzie writes:
>>
>> First, my tirade was not intended to be as such. I wanted to pull the
>>> patch because it was incorrect and I did not want anyone else working
>>> on it wh
On 2/22/11 4:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
James McKenzie writes:
First, my tirade was not intended to be as such. I wanted to pull the
patch because it was incorrect and I did not want anyone else working
on it while I silently trimmed it and made it better.
Second, I realize this has aff
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> It was already unlikely that you would get any of your patches in, based
> on their technical merit, but now even if you managed to make your code
> acceptable, I wouldn't put it in, because I can't trust you not to make
> me pull it o
James McKenzie writes:
> First, my tirade was not intended to be as such. I wanted to pull the
> patch because it was incorrect and I did not want anyone else working
> on it while I silently trimmed it and made it better.
> Second, I realize this has affected my 'Jeremy White' score. I hope
>
First, my tirade was not intended to be as such. I wanted to pull the
patch because it was incorrect and I did not want anyone else working on
it while I silently trimmed it and made it better.
Second, I realize this has affected my 'Jeremy White' score. I hope
that AJ understands why the code
