Re: Anonymous structs/unions

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Joel Parker wrote: > As seen here , > we seem to be going through a lot of trouble to enable anonymous structs > and unions for those compilers that support it. Why do this, especially > when we need to name them anyway for those that don't? >

Re: Anonymous structs/unions

2007-01-17 Thread Robert Shearman
Joel Parker wrote: As seen here , we seem to be going through a lot of trouble to enable anonymous structs and unions for those compilers that support it. Why do this, especially when we need to name them anyway for those that don't? For

Anonymous structs/unions

2007-01-17 Thread Joel Parker
As seen here , we seem to be going through a lot of trouble to enable anonymous structs and unions for those compilers that support it. Why do this, especially when we need to name them anyway for those that don't? My reason for asking is that