"Hans Leidekker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Use a fixed width font to view this message]
>
> MSVC MinGW GCC
>
> Alignment of __int64: 8 8 8
> Size of __int64: 8 8 8
>
> Alignment of large_int: 8 8 4
> Size of large_int
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clearly GCC is the odd one out. When a double is embedded in
> a structure GCC does not adjust the alignment of the structure
> to the size of a double.
>
> So, should we add -malign-double to the compiler flags?
No, that would break Unix compatibility
Hi,
[Use a fixed width font to view this message]
MSVC MinGW GCC
Alignment of __int64: 8 8 8
Size of __int64: 8 8 8
Alignment of large_int: 8 8 4
Size of large_int:8 8 8
Alignment of container1: 8
"Hans Leidekker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kernel/tests/generated.c currently shows one failure
> when the executable is compiled with MinGW. Investigation
> shows that MinGW and GCC differ when it comes to alignment
> of doubles (i.e. a 64 bit wide type).
>
> I have constructed the test below
Hi,
kernel/tests/generated.c currently shows one failure
when the executable is compiled with MinGW. Investigation
shows that MinGW and GCC differ when it comes to alignment
of doubles (i.e. a 64 bit wide type).
I have constructed the test below that shows the difference
between MinGW and GCC. M
