Re: Advapi32: Service Control RPC

2008-01-10 Thread Robert Shearman
Rolf Kalbermatter wrote: > Robert Shearman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> No. Everything (except multi-dimensional arrays, possibly) >> can already be done by the code we output already. Adding >> code to output -Oicf proc format strings in widl would be >> possible, but unnecessary. >

RE: Advapi32: Service Control RPC

2008-01-09 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
Robert Shearman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The current service control API directly accesses the registry for >> most things. >> In native those fucntions are simple wrappers around RPC calls to the >> actual service.exe application. Mikolaj Zalewski offered about 3 >> months ago a pos

Re: Advapi32: Service Control RPC

2008-01-09 Thread Robert Shearman
Rolf Kalbermatter wrote: > The current service control API directly accesses the registry for most > things. > In native those fucntions are simple wrappers around RPC calls to the actual > service.exe application. Mikolaj Zalewski offered about 3 months ago a > possible > aproach to implement the

Advapi32: Service Control RPC

2008-01-09 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
The current service control API directly accesses the registry for most things. In native those fucntions are simple wrappers around RPC calls to the actual service.exe application. Mikolaj Zalewski offered about 3 months ago a possible aproach to implement the service.exe program. In there the pr