Re: Additional downloads for winehq

2004-05-27 Thread Duane Clark
Ivan wrote: ... and the link to the dcom95 download page is just too long. It's http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=d7a4de78-81a9-4db7-beb6-84ff99342172&displaylang=en and we want to keep the error log short. You could use: http://tinyurl.com/ which I used to turn the above UR

Re: Additional downloads for winehq

2004-05-26 Thread Ivan
OK, I don't see the utility of having a 3rd party download section just to list one download. But what about dcom95? We have a message in oleaut that tells the user to download dcom95, and it provides a link to sf, but we can't host dom on sf because it isn't open source, and people can download i

Re: Additional downloads for winehq

2004-05-26 Thread Jeremy Newman
I don't think these belong on the download page. That would confuse the users. IMO the download page should only contain links to download Wine. All this should go in a HowTo or in the docs. I know we have the 3rd party tools section there. I was opposed to that as well. We just cleaned up the down