On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:00:32AM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Huw,
>
> Can you look at the debug log after applying the SupportInfo Patch in
> the bug#6341.
Well of course I see the app QI(IRunnableObject) but that doesn't mean
that it should succeed.
Note there are a bunch of unimplemen
Huw,
Can you look at the debug log after applying the SupportInfo Patch in
the bug#6341.
I think QI should be done for IXMLDocument not IXMLNode.
I will try to do it for IXMLNode as well.
Thanks,
VJ
On 10/11/06, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:55:41AM -0400, Vi
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:55:41AM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> I will wait on sending tests on this one.
> Until the first one gets in
> (http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-September/030659.html)
Ok, so let's look at that one.
I think the problem here is that ISupportErrorIn
/11/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Huw Davies wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > > Add IRunnableObject stub implementation,
> >
> > It's not at all clear to me what this interface sho
On 10/10/06, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > Add IRunnableObject stub implementation,
>
> It's not at all clear to me what this interface should do in this
> context. Could you at least add a test that shows t
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Add IRunnableObject stub implementation,
It's not at all clear to me what this interface should do in this
context. Could you at least add a test that shows that the domdoc
object should expose I
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Add IRunnableObject stub implementation,
It's not at all clear to me what this interface should do in this
context. Could you at least add a test that shows that the domdoc
object should expose IRunnableObject?
Thanks,
Huw.
