On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Mike
> Kaplinskiy wrote:
>> I have been thinking about the correct way to implement AcceptEx, and
>> I was looking for comments about the approach. Note I know all of
>> these cases will require tests, I'm jus
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Mike
Kaplinskiy wrote:
> I have been thinking about the correct way to implement AcceptEx, and
> I was looking for comments about the approach. Note I know all of
> these cases will require tests, I'm just listing them for problems
> someone might see.
>
> Wineserver
I have been thinking about the correct way to implement AcceptEx, and
I was looking for comments about the approach. Note I know all of
these cases will require tests, I'm just listing them for problems
someone might see.
Wineserver changes:
- add an async* to the socket structure to track this s
