Re: [patch but not quite ready] NamedPipes messagemode

2009-02-16 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17195 > > with only one significant bug - some memory corruption - the semantics > are now correct in the namedpipe messagemode patch. found it. as suspected, utilising the same critica

[patch but not quite ready] NamedPipes messagemode

2009-02-16 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17195 with only one significant bug - some memory corruption - the semantics are now correct in the namedpipe messagemode patch. i drew a diagram outlining the data structures / design http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19449 because it's so horrendous

Re: [patch but not quite ready] NamedPipes messagemode

2009-02-15 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> 5) running MSYS: fail. found it: rxvt.exe is looking for libX11.dll (!!) which is nothing to do with NamedPipes. running c:/msys/bin/sh.exe --login -i is: success.

Re: [patch but not quite ready] NamedPipes messagemode

2009-02-15 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17195 > > with only one significant bug - some memory corruption - the semantics > are now correct in the namedpipe messagemode patch. found it. as suspected, utilising the same critica

[patch but not quite ready] NamedPipes messagemode

2009-02-14 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17195 with only one significant bug - some memory corruption - the semantics are now correct in the namedpipe messagemode patch. i drew a diagram outlining the data structures / design http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19449 because it's so horrendous