Re: [patch] riched20 conformance test

2006-01-24 Thread Thomas Kho
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:23:40 +0900, "Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > If you're submitting the patch, make sure to send it to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] as that's the only place that patches will be > picked up from. Will do with this (smaller) patch! > * You linked the test with "riched20

re: [patch] riched20 conformance test

2006-01-20 Thread Dan Kegel
For anyone trying to apply the patch and wondering why make complains, it's because configure needs to be updated. (Or apply the attached patch, which manually adds the new directory in the two places it needs to be added.) In the snippet + parent = new_richedit(NULL); + hwndRichEdit = new_riche

Re: [patch] riched20 conformance test

2006-01-19 Thread Mike McCormack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have started writing a conformance test for the rich edit control (riched20). The purpose is for students in UCLA's CS 130 Software Engineering course to first extend this conformance test to test conformance to unimplemented features, and then later implement their

[patch] riched20 conformance test

2006-01-19 Thread tkho
Greetings, I have started writing a conformance test for the rich edit control (riched20). The purpose is for students in UCLA's CS 130 Software Engineering course to first extend this conformance test to test conformance to unimplemented features, and then later implement their chosen featur