Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 14:49 schrieben Sie:
> Leon Freitag wrote:
> >> BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
> >> patch but it was rejected.
> >
> > Well, try to resubmit it :) Or post it here, so that others could test
> > it. Perhaps you could merge this one-li
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 14:49 schrieb Tomas Carnecky:
> Leon Freitag wrote:
> >> BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
> >> patch but it was rejected.
> >
> > Well, try to resubmit it :) Or post it here, so that others could test
> > it. Perhaps you could merge th
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 14:49 schrieb Tomas Carnecky:
> Leon Freitag wrote:
> >> BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
> >> patch but it was rejected.
> >
> > Well, try to resubmit it :) Or post it here, so that others could test
> > it. Perhaps you could merge th
Leon Freitag wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 14:49 schrieb Tomas Carnecky:
>> Leon Freitag wrote:
BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
patch but it was rejected.
>>> Well, try to resubmit it :) Or post it here, so that others could test
>>> it. Perhaps
Leon Freitag wrote:
>> BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
>> patch but it was rejected.
>
> Well, try to resubmit it :) Or post it here, so that others could test it.
> Perhaps you could merge this one-liner into it and then resubmit it.
>
Yep, here it is. But
> The BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is another problem.. here you
> should get a BadMatch in X_GLXMakeCurrent.
That's true, this patch should only fix the BadMatches in glXMakeCurrent.
> BadMatch in X_GLXCreateGLXPixmap is a known problem, I've submitted a
> patch but it was rejected.
Well, tr
Willie Sippel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 2. April 2006 16:44 schrieb Leon Freitag:
>> Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable()
>> violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for
>> the visualid. However this code has been already present before th
Am Sonntag, 2. April 2006 16:44 schrieb Leon Freitag:
> Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable()
> violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for
> the visualid. However this code has been already present before the
> regression, but worked
Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable()
violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for
the visualid. However this code has been already present before the
regression, but worked somehow. So the regression can't be caused by this
violat
