Raphael wrote:
but it's of no use with the patch you sent, so why clobber the patch
with this ?
no because i think its better to avoid assert in this case on dbghelp code :)
But if you prefer i can restore original code
IMO the correct fix would in field insertion to return one of three valu
> but it's of no use with the patch you sent, so why clobber the patch
> with this ?
no because i think its better to avoid assert in this case on dbghelp code :)
But if you prefer i can restore original code
> A+
Regards,
Raphael
pgpUAB1PaRkR3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Raphael wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2005 21:27, Eric Pouech wrote:
BOOL symt_add_udt_element(struct module* module, struct symt_udt*
assert(m->symt.tag == SymTagData);
if (m->hash_elt.name[0] == name[0] && strcmp(m->hash_elt.name,
name) == 0) -return TRUE;
+
On Monday 10 October 2005 21:27, Eric Pouech wrote:
> > BOOL symt_add_udt_element(struct module* module, struct symt_udt*
> assert(m->symt.tag == SymTagData);
> > if (m->hash_elt.name[0] == name[0] && strcmp(m->hash_elt.name,
> > name) == 0) -return TRUE;
> > +
Raphael wrote:
Hi,
Changelog:
- begin of dwarf debug lines parsing
- better robustness
- support of unamed syms
- better traces
TODO:
- find a clean way to handle forward declarations
- debug lines parsing
Index: type.c
===
