Re: [RESENT] Check for a valid buffer in NTReadFile

> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The EFAULT handler doesn't trigger for the test in >> wine/dll/kernel/test/file.c:1389 >> >> Without the extra check, the test fails. Alexandre> The te

Re: [RESENT] Check for a valid buffer in NTReadFile

Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The EFAULT handler doesn't trigger for the test in > wine/dll/kernel/test/file.c:1389 > > Without the extra check, the test fails. The test works fine here. Looks like you'll need to debug this further. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESENT] Check for a valid buffer in NTReadFile

> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Changelog: wine/dlls/ntdll/file.c: NtReadFile() Reject a NULL buffer Alexandre> That should be handled by the EFAULT case already. Why does Alexandre> it make a

Re: [RESENT] Check for a valid buffer in NTReadFile

Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Changelog: >wine/dlls/ntdll/file.c: NtReadFile() >Reject a NULL buffer That should be handled by the EFAULT case already. Why does it make a difference for you? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]