Francois Gouget writes:
> We can potentially change the criteria that TestBot uses to decide
> whether to skip. But what should these be here? Also, do they really
> belong in WineTestBot, which would likely require duplicating that code
> to WineTest too, or should the skipping really be done
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 11/12/12 13:21, Marvin wrote:
[...]
> > === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) ===
> > webbrowser.c:2596: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath
> > webbrowser.c:2601: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON
> > webbrowser.c:2602: Test failed: expe
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22897
Your paranoid android
On 11/12/12 13:21, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/
