Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel32: Fix an off-by-one error.

2009-03-24 Thread James Hawkins
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > James Hawkins writes: > >>> This cannot be right. What happens to the original first_section then? >>> >> >> I don't really understand your question.  By original first_section, >> do you mean the first_section that we loaded from an ex

Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel32: Fix an off-by-one error.

2009-03-24 Thread Alexandre Julliard
James Hawkins writes: >> This cannot be right. What happens to the original first_section then? >> > > I don't really understand your question. By original first_section, > do you mean the first_section that we loaded from an existing file or > that is in the cache? If so, then the answer is th

Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel32: Fix an off-by-one error.

2009-03-24 Thread James Hawkins
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > James Hawkins writes: > >> --- >>  dlls/kernel32/profile.c       |    2 +- >>  dlls/kernel32/tests/profile.c |   30 ++ >>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/pr

Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel32: Fix an off-by-one error.

2009-03-24 Thread Alexandre Julliard
James Hawkins writes: > --- > dlls/kernel32/profile.c |2 +- > dlls/kernel32/tests/profile.c | 30 ++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/profile.c b/dlls/kernel32/profile.c > index 5d563a5..b6ad6d0 100644 > -