Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-22 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 1/22/2010 11:20, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/21/2010 07:20 PM, Reece Dunn wrote: ?_? Hmmm. According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163436.aspx, this should work (but then msdn isn't always right). Do you know what happens if the CoGetMalloc/IMalloc_DidAlloc call is not made?

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-22 Thread Paul Vriens
On 01/21/2010 07:20 PM, Reece Dunn wrote: ?_? Hmmm. According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163436.aspx, this should work (but then msdn isn't always right). Do you know what happens if the CoGetMalloc/IMalloc_DidAlloc call is not made? If I leave this out the test doesn't cr

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Reece Dunn
2010/1/21 Paul Vriens : > On 01/21/2010 06:54 PM, Reece Dunn wrote: >> >> 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: >>> >>> On 1/21/2010 20:41, Reece Dunn wrote: 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: > > On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: > >> >> On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov >>>

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Paul Vriens
On 01/21/2010 06:54 PM, Reece Dunn wrote: 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: On 1/21/2010 20:41, Reece Dunn wrote: 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivovwrote: On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM,

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Reece Dunn
2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov : > On 1/21/2010 20:41, Reece Dunn wrote: >> >> 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: >> >>> >>> On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: >>> On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov  wrote: > > On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: > >> >> On 01/18/

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 1/21/2010 20:41, Reece Dunn wrote: 2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov: On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Add basic test st

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Reece Dunn
2010/1/21 Nikolay Sivov : > On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: >> >> On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >> >>> On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > > Add basic test structure for IXmlReader > Hi Nikola

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 1/21/2010 19:49, Paul Vriens wrote: On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader Hi Nikolay, This one crashes on Vista without a servicepack at: +IXmlRead

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Paul Vriens
On 21 jan 2010, at 17:26, Nikolay Sivov wrote: On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader Hi Nikolay, This one crashes on Vista without a servicepack at: +IXmlReader_Release(reader); +} All the calls be

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 1/21/2010 19:19, Paul Vriens wrote: On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader Hi Nikolay, This one crashes on Vista without a servicepack at: +IXmlReader_Release(reader); +} All the calls before that one look ok (they produce the expected o

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmllite/tests: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader

2010-01-21 Thread Paul Vriens
On 01/18/2010 10:28 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Add basic test structure for IXmlReader Hi Nikolay, This one crashes on Vista without a servicepack at: +IXmlReader_Release(reader); +} All the calls before that one look ok (they produce the expected output). I guess "vista without an SP" c