Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
>> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> +fd = get_sock_fd( s, FILE_READ_DATA, NULL );
>>> +if (fd == -1)
>>> +{
>>> +SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK);
>>> +return
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +fd = get_sock_fd( s, FILE_READ_DATA, NULL );
>> +if (fd == -1)
>> +{
>> +SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK);
>> +return SOCKET_ERROR;
>> +}
>> +release_sock_fd( s, f
Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
> +fd = get_sock_fd( s, FILE_READ_DATA, NULL );
> +if (fd == -1)
> +{
> +SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK);
> +return SOCKET_ERROR;
> +}
> +release_sock_fd( s, fd );
You should avoid retrieving the fd if you are not using it. The
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2062
Your paranoid andr
