Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
>SYSINFO_PARMS.wDeviceType = (WORD)(DWORD)MCI_ALL_DEVICE_ID;
>work better ?
I tested ... = (WORD)MCI_ALL_DEVICE_ID which
should do the same. It does not yield the "all" functionality.
>did you check what mciGetDeviceID("all") returns on Vista or XP ?
Yes, and it is in the
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com a écrit :
Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
did you test the 16 => 32 bit conversion for the MCI_ALL_DEVICE ?
It's good you asked. Upon closer inspection, MCI_Sysinfo appears to
behave differently. I'd say it's even a bug in MS that setting
SYSINFO_PARMS.wDevic
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com a écrit :
Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
did you test the 16 => 32 bit conversion for the MCI_ALL_DEVICE ?
Which ones do you have in mind? There are tests involving MCI_ALL_DEVICE_ID
that pass on both win9x and later (also in patch #5). I wrote a few
more MCI
Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
>did you test the 16 => 32 bit conversion for the MCI_ALL_DEVICE ?
It's good you asked. Upon closer inspection, MCI_Sysinfo appears to
behave differently. I'd say it's even a bug in MS that setting
SYSINFO_PARMS.wDeviceType = MCI_ALL_DEVICE_ID is not recognized! Only
send
Hi,
Eric Pouech wrote:
>did you test the 16 => 32 bit conversion for the MCI_ALL_DEVICE ?
Which ones do you have in mind? There are tests involving MCI_ALL_DEVICE_ID
that pass on both win9x and later (also in patch #5). I wrote a few
more MCI tests privately. Generally, I added (UINT16) casts i
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com a écrit :
Hi,
this is the first of a series of patches I started writing last year.
It suffered from the typical "some patches are 100% complete but
follow others that are only 80%" syndrome. Now I filled in the missing parts.
The fifth implements more tests to
