Alex Henrie writes:
> 2012/9/3 Alexandre Julliard :
>> You don't have a single test with an explicit source length, so
>> obviously you are not going to find problems in that area. Like I said,
>> you need a lot more tests.
>
> example_2 already tests an explicit source length. In all the other
>
2012/9/3 Alexandre Julliard :
> You don't have a single test with an explicit source length, so
> obviously you are not going to find problems in that area. Like I said,
> you need a lot more tests.
example_2 already tests an explicit source length. In all the other
examples srclen = strlen(src) +
Alex Henrie writes:
> I was asked to split this patch up, so I did. The complaint about the
> last version was "You are still overflowing the source." I have not
> been able to find any test case that my implementation handled
> incorrectly, however, I did find that (*src == 0 && srclen < 0) will
