Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25646
Your paranoid android
Hi Zhan,
On 05/17/13 16:53, Zhan Jianyu wrote:
> This patch is built based on Jaceks's newly-submitted patch:
>
> commit 48a862306288d69d3623d5ecdc0f5a5a40addafe
> ( vbscript: Round half to even in to_int)
>
> Thanks, Jacek. :-)
>
> With his patch, CInt could be implementd in a clean way,
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25604
Your paranoid android
On 26 April 2013 12:41, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 04/26/13 12:02, Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> On 26 April 2013 10:27, Jacek Caban wrote:
>>> - round is not portable. As I mentioned you before, Wine needs to be C89
>>> compatible. If we need some features that are not part of C89, we need
>>> to be care
On 04/26/13 12:02, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 26 April 2013 10:27, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> - round is not portable. As I mentioned you before, Wine needs to be C89
>> compatible. If we need some features that are not part of C89, we need
>> to be careful about that and it often requires things like c
On 26 April 2013 10:27, Jacek Caban wrote:
> - round is not portable. As I mentioned you before, Wine needs to be C89
> compatible. If we need some features that are not part of C89, we need
> to be careful about that and it often requires things like configure
> checks. In case of round, replacin
Hi Zhan,
It's better, thanks, but still needs more work.
On 04/25/13 23:37, Zhan Jianyu wrote:
> }
>
> +
> +
While we're at this, please put more attention into whitespace changes,
esp. useless ones.
> static HRESULT to_double(VARIANT *v, double *ret)
> {
> switch(V_VT(v)) {
> @@ -217
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25301
Your paranoid android
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> The man page for modf claims it produces an exact fractional part:
> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/quantal/en/man3/modf.3.html
>
> It's possible for modf to do this because the fractional part of a
> floating point number cannot requi
The man page for modf claims it produces an exact fractional part:
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/quantal/en/man3/modf.3.html
It's possible for modf to do this because the fractional part of a
floating point number cannot require more precision than the original
value.
So I think you've esse
Hi. Vincent.
The hard part of Banker's Rounding function is to determine if the
fractional part is *exactly* 0.5. Thus, to use ceil and floor , one way
(for the positive case) is adding 0.5 to a double value, then judge whether
the floor of result number equals to the ceil of result number. And
Dealing with the bits of a floating point number directly is a bit
odd, and it makes it hard to review the code. Is there a reason you
don't want to use things like modf, floor, and ceil?
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25204
Your paranoid android
13 matches
Mail list logo
