Le 13/11/2012 23:07, Marvin a écrit :
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDet
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22927
Your paranoid android
Christian Costa writes:
> 2012/11/9 Alexandre Julliard
> Testing last error on success is not useful. Also please use
> MAKELONG
> and related macros instead of doing it by hand.
>
> I can't use LOWORD as the signed bit is not propagated with & 0x.
You could always add a cast, b
2012/11/9 Alexandre Julliard
> Christian Costa writes:
>
> > +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> > +n = MapWindowPoints(wnd, NULL, NULL, 0);
> > +err = GetLastError();
> > +ok(n == ((window_rect.top << 16) | window_rect.left), "Got %x (%d,
> %d), expected %x (%d, %d)\n",
> > + n,
Christian Costa writes:
> +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> +n = MapWindowPoints(wnd, NULL, NULL, 0);
> +err = GetLastError();
> +ok(n == ((window_rect.top << 16) | window_rect.left), "Got %x (%d, %d),
> expected %x (%d, %d)\n",
> + n, (n << 16) >> 16, n >> 16, window_rect.left,
