On 05/27/2010 10:37 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
> On 5/27/10 11:20 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> Since it's relevant I'll mention the CIOPFS (case-insensitive on
>> purpose) FUSE module that was made a while back. It works fine as far
>> as I can tell (and I believe Mac supports FUSE),
> I tried compil
On 5/27/10 11:20 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Since it's relevant I'll mention the CIOPFS (case-insensitive on
> purpose) FUSE module that was made a while back. It works fine as far
> as I can tell (and I believe Mac supports FUSE),
I tried compiling it from git on my Mac and it failed horribly (it
On 05/26/2010 02:52 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Charles Davis writes:
>
>> I've been running with this set for... it's been so long, I can't
>> remember! What's preventing it from being committed? (I know it's not
>> the impending release, because otherwise the Patch list would say
>> they're
Charles Davis writes:
> I've been running with this set for... it's been so long, I can't
> remember! What's preventing it from being committed? (I know it's not
> the impending release, because otherwise the Patch list would say
> they're "Deferred".)
You certainly don't want to enumerate mount
I've been running with this set for... it's been so long, I can't
remember! What's preventing it from being committed? (I know it's not
the impending release, because otherwise the Patch list would say
they're "Deferred".)
Chip
