On Oct 9, 2011, at 1:42 PM, David Laight wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:48:40PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Charles Davis writes:
>>
>>> @@ -268,9 +256,9 @@ int send_thread_signal( struct thread *thread, int sig )
>>> if (!mach_port_extract_right( process_port, thread->unix
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:48:40PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Charles Davis writes:
>
> > @@ -268,9 +256,9 @@ int send_thread_signal( struct thread *thread, int sig )
> > if (!mach_port_extract_right( process_port, thread->unix_tid,
> >MACH
Charles Davis writes:
> @@ -268,9 +256,9 @@ int send_thread_signal( struct thread *thread, int sig )
> if (!mach_port_extract_right( process_port, thread->unix_tid,
>MACH_MSG_TYPE_COPY_SEND, &port, &type
> ))
> {
> -if ((ret =
On Oct 7, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Probably a spurious failure
Yeah... especially considering that:
- That change only affects Mac OS X, and I haven't added my buildslave yet ;).
(That file shouldn't even get built on non-Darwin.)
- Wine won't even build 64-bit on Mac OS yet (and mi
Probably a spurious failure - I was running rpcrt4 tests on
that machine, and they may both have wanted the same port number.
Shame on me.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Fails tests on x86_64?
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, wrote:
>> This is an experimental automated
Fails tests on x86_64?
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, wrote:
> This is an experimental automated build and test service.
> Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
>
> For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
>
> The Buildbot has detected
