Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Fix existing conftests for nanosecond precision time fields.

2012-11-29 Thread Charles Davis
On Nov 29, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Charles Davis wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> Charles Davis writes: >> >>> From: Charles Davis >>> >>> Autoconf checks for a field of a struct by using it in an if() >>> expression. Of course, you can't do this for an aggr

Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Fix existing conftests for nanosecond precision time fields.

2012-11-29 Thread Charles Davis
On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Charles Davis writes: > >> From: Charles Davis >> >> Autoconf checks for a field of a struct by using it in an if() >> expression. Of course, you can't do this for an aggregate field, so you >> must instead check a field of that aggreg

Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Fix existing conftests for nanosecond precision time fields.

2012-11-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Charles Davis writes: > From: Charles Davis > > Autoconf checks for a field of a struct by using it in an if() > expression. Of course, you can't do this for an aggregate field, so you > must instead check a field of that aggregate instead. Up until now, the > conftests for the st_?tim fields we