On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> >> Probably this should be a win_slip().
> >
> > The function exists only since Windows 7/Vista (not XP) and is not yet
> > in Wine (and might take a while, as my time is limited currently
> > and my knowledge of this specific function same).
> >
> > So
>> Probably this should be a win_slip().
>
> The function exists only since Windows 7/Vista (not XP) and is not yet
> in Wine (and might take a while, as my time is limited currently
> and my knowledge of this specific function same).
>
> So I think "skip" is currently the right thing ;)
I think a
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 11:40:52PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > +if (!pInitializeConditionVariable) {
> > +skip("no condition variable support.\n");
> > +return;
> > +}
>
> Probably this should be a win_slip().
The function exists only si
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> +if (!pInitializeConditionVariable) {
> +skip("no condition variable support.\n");
> +return;
> +}
Probably this should be a win_slip().
> +/* fprintf(stderr,"produced %d, c1 %d, c2 %d\n", totalproduced, cnt1,
> cnt2); */
> +
> +/* The s
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21332
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21331
Your paranoid android
