Op 04-12-12 17:26, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
> Hi,
>
> Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Alsa's native period is ~ 22ms (1024 samples / 44100 or 48000) with dmix
>> despite claiming it to be otherwise..
> What I don't understand is why you talk about ALSA at this level. DSound talks
> to
Hi,
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>Alsa's native period is ~ 22ms (1024 samples / 44100 or 48000) with dmix
>despite claiming it to be otherwise..
What I don't understand is why you talk about ALSA at this level. DSound talks
to mmdevapi and that's DSound's underlying API, not ALSA.
So if Wine's mmd
Op 03-12-12 17:59, Andrew Eikum schreef:
> (...) I think the best solution is to have dsound call into the system
> openal to perform multichannel mixing and 3D processing. (...)
>
> Andrew
... Must print this out on poster format, and frame this above my bed..
~Maarten
Op 03-12-12 14:59, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
> Hi,
>
> Maarten Lankhorst queried:
>> Bump, anything wrong with this patch?
> Here's my 0.0$ ... (standard DSound disclaimer here...)
>
> Using mmdevapi's events in DSound is basically TRT.
> Then, the DSound mixer will be synchronized
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 02:59:07PM +0100, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> BTW, I still believe that mixing and resampling would find their best place
> in mmdevapi, not DSound.
>
Perhaps, but that's provably not what Windows does. Given a format with:
dwChannelMask = (CHANNEL_BACK_
Hi,
Maarten Lankhorst queried:
>Bump, anything wrong with this patch?
Here's my 0.0$ ... (standard DSound disclaimer here...)
Using mmdevapi's events in DSound is basically TRT.
Then, the DSound mixer will be synchronized with mmdevapi writes.
>+ /* ALSA is retarded, add a timeout.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:50:20PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 21-11-12 19:16, Maarten Lankhorst schreef:
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> >
> Bump, anything wrong with this patch?
>
Been spending my "Wine time" on Bug 32297 this week. I'll take a look
at this shortly.
Andrew
Op 21-11-12 19:16, Maarten Lankhorst schreef:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
>
Bump, anything wrong with this patch?