Amine Khaldi writes:
> In this case ending up with windows.h is not needed, so if we:
>
> #define WIN32_NO_STATUS
> #define _INC_WINDOWS
> #define COM_NO_WINDOWS_H
>
> That prevents it.
>
> Should I send a second patch with these defines ?
No, that's ugly, particularly the _INC_WINDOWS one.
--
On 12/03/2013 11:27, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Amine Khaldi writes:
>
>> @@ -28,13 +28,10 @@
>>
>> #include "windef.h"
>> #include "winbase.h"
>> -#include "winuser.h"
>>
>> #include "objbase.h"
>> #include "iads.h"
>> -#include "adshlp.h"
>>
>> -#include "wine/unicode.h"
>> #include
Amine Khaldi writes:
> @@ -28,13 +28,10 @@
>
> #include "windef.h"
> #include "winbase.h"
> -#include "winuser.h"
>
> #include "objbase.h"
> #include "iads.h"
> -#include "adshlp.h"
>
> -#include "wine/unicode.h"
> #include "wine/debug.h"
It's not worth the trouble, particularly since
