Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-29 Thread Kuba Ober
On poniedziaƅek 07 marzec 2005 02:40 pm, Mike Hearn wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:21 +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > > Gnome has the notion of "default email client", i suspect KDE has it too. > > Unless you use Bonobo+Evolution (and maybe KMail+DCOP) though you can't > match the abilities of

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-09 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:44 -0700, Matthew Mastracci wrote: > Mozilla's command-line API also lets you create rich messages as well > (attachments, to/from/subject, body). Perhaps a "wine-mapi" shell > script might be required until freedesktop comes up with a proper mail > sending spec? > >

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-08 Thread Matthew Mastracci
Mike Hearn wrote: On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:21 +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: Gnome has the notion of "default email client", i suspect KDE has it too. Unless you use Bonobo+Evolution (and maybe KMail+DCOP) though you can't match the abilities of MAPI, which lets you create arbitrary emails. Mozil

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-07 Thread Mike Hearn
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:21 +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > Gnome has the notion of "default email client", i suspect KDE has it too. Unless you use Bonobo+Evolution (and maybe KMail+DCOP) though you can't match the abilities of MAPI, which lets you create arbitrary emails.

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-07 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Mike Hearn wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:54:43 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote: Also, I believe MAPISendMail should just forward to the appropriate mail provider, rather than implementing mail sending itself. More to the point, isn't this supposed to bring up the users email client? We can't do that

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-07 Thread Mike Hearn
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:54:43 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote: > Also, I believe MAPISendMail should just forward to the appropriate mail > provider, rather than implementing mail sending itself. More to the point, isn't this supposed to bring up the users email client? We can't do that on Linux so I

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-07 Thread Robert Shearman
Andreas Mohr wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:54:56AM +0100, Jan Schiefer wrote: This is an attempt of an basic MAPISendMail() implementation. It does, what is should, it sends mails. Much more work is needed especially to clean it up and to implement more features. ( Getting rid of printf

Re: [PATCH] MapiSendMail() implementation

2005-03-07 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:54:56AM +0100, Jan Schiefer wrote: > This is an attempt of an basic MAPISendMail() implementation. > It does, what is should, it sends mails. > > Much more work is needed especially to clean it up and to implement more > features. ( Getting rid of printf's would be