Re: [OLE #3] Tests For COM Functions (Try 2)

2004-12-21 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This differs from the previous send of this patch by not using some > functions that are not present on Win9x and without DCOM95 and by > disabling the out-of-process COM tests, which seems to need more work, > but is useful for me testing locally.

Re: [OLE #3] Tests For COM Functions

2004-12-01 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Under Win95 the tests don't run due to missing APIs CoResumeClassObjects > and CoInitializeEx. Win98 results: marshal.c test doesn't run either, but this time due to missing kernel32.OpenThread; moniker.c tests pass. -- Dmitry.

Re: [OLE #3] Tests For COM Functions

2004-12-01 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have only tried these tests on WinXP SP2. Please report > if they fail on Win9x. In order compile the tests with Platform SDK I applied the attached patch. Under win2k SP4 I got: marshal.c:898: Test failed: CoGetClassObject should have returned