"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I did grep the source, and it seems that we're using the
> MSVCRT_ prefix only in dlls/msvcrt/*.c. And so it's not clear to
> me that duplicating part of the headers is going to be that bad.
> I mean, we will need duplication only for the s
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:09:36AM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I don't see how this would solve problems like the _WCTYPE_T_DEFINED
> issue.
Right, it will not solve problems like this (for Boaz: _WCTYPE_T_DEFINED
is a sentry for not defining a type twice, check out pretty much any header
u
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When compiling with STLPort I saw a method that can eliminate the need
>> for the MSVCRT macro and yet produce MSVCRT_xxx for those who need it
>> and an xxx for those how don't.
>> Basically you have your Regular cleanroom headers-set for wine
> When compiling with STLPort I saw a method that can eliminate the need
> for the MSVCRT macro and yet produce MSVCRT_xxx for those who need it
> and an xxx for those how don't.
> Basically you have your Regular cleanroom headers-set for wine-lib and
> external dlls. And you have another set
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:16:06AM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
No I don't think we want that. The headers are not that stable, we are
still making changes to them. We also need the MSVCRT definitions in
multiple dlls so there would be a lot of duplication.
Yes,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:16:06AM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> No I don't think we want that. The headers are not that stable, we are
> still making changes to them. We also need the MSVCRT definitions in
> multiple dlls so there would be a lot of duplication.
Yes, the headers are not stabl
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre, why don't we just remove all those MSVCRT() macros,
> use the headers in Winelib apps, and duplicate what we need
> with a MSVCRT_ prefix in an internal header that we use just
> for building? These things are quite stable, so the risk of
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:42:28AM +0200, Hans Leidekker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch:
>
> http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2004/04/0357.html
>
> broke the MinGW build of msvcrt. The changelog says it's a compatibility
> fix. Dimi: what compatibility were you aiming at with this patc
